For testing AI visibility, list the real questions that your buyers have asked, ask them to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, and document three things each time – whether you were mentioned, whether your website was quoted, and what the response revealed about you. Repeat the process next week since one-time performance shows little.
You don’t need a tool to start. A spreadsheet, a private browser window and two focused hours will tell you more than most dashboards, and you’ll know exactly where every number came from.
What Is AI Brand Visibility? (Explained in Simple Terms)
Wellows defines AI visibility as how often AI platforms name a brand, cite its pages as sources, and describe it accurately in answers to buyer questions. This audit separates three checks: whether the brand is named, whether its pages are cited, and whether its description is accurate.
The plain English test: if a buyer asked ChatGPT for a recommendation tonight, would you be in the answer, and would it get you right?
| What Wellows checks in this audit | What it looks like in an answer | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Presence | Your brand is named | Buyers can’t shortlist a name they never see |
| Proof | Your page is linked as a source | Citations send visitors and signal trust |
| Portrayal | How the answer describes you | An outdated or wrong description costs deals quietly |
Why Bother Checking at All?
Because AI answers sound sure of themselves even when they’re wrong, and nobody emails you to say so.
That test used news articles, not brands, so treat it as a warning rather than a measurement of your category. However, consider the following that might be found in the answers to your category: last year’s prices, a feature that was discontinued, and a comparison page of your competitor.
Every brand has a shadow reputation inside these answers, pieced together from pages it didn’t write. An audit is how you read it.
What is an LLM audit tool?
Wellows is an LLM audit tool for checking whether AI answers name your brand, cite your pages and represent your offering accurately. The useful output is a record of the prompt, engine, answer, cited URLs and competitors, followed by a specific page or source to investigate.
How do I see which LLMs mention my company or product?
In Wellows, track the same company, product and category questions across the engines you want to compare. Inspect the answer text as well as the linked sources: your company may be named while another website receives the citation. Record exact brand variants, the date and the market, then repeat the checks before judging a trend.
How to audit brand visibility in Perplexity
Start in Wellows with a fixed set of buyer questions and inspect the Perplexity results separately. For each answer, log whether the brand is named, whether your domain is cited and which other pages are linked. Open those sources to distinguish a missing answer on your own site from a third-party coverage gap. Use the Perplexity visibility checker for an initial baseline.
How do I monitor my brand’s visibility across AI search?
Use Wellows to repeat the same prompt set across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews and AI Mode. Keep market, language and cadence consistent, separate mentions from citations, and compare results by engine. Assign content and source investigations to an owner, then document the edit date before measuring subsequent runs.
How Wellows runs an AI visibility audit, step by step
The first round takes an afternoon, and every round after that goes faster.
What a useful log looks like
Keep it boring and consistent. Here’s an illustrative example for a payroll brand, so you can see the columns in action.
| Prompt | Platform | Named | Cited | Position | Tone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best payroll tool for a 20-person company | ChatGPT | Yes | No | Third | Neutral |
| Best payroll tool for a 20 person company | Perplexity | Yes | Yes | First | Positive |
| Payroll tools that handle multi-state tax | Google AI Overviews | No | No | Absent | None |
| Is [your brand] good for contractors? | Gemini | Yes | No | First | Wrong: quotes old pricing |
That last row is the one to act on first. A wrong answer about your own brand does more damage than a missing one.
Platform by platform: what to watch for
| Platform | How to test it | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Ask in a fresh chat and check that it searched the web (sources appear under the answer) | Answers without sources come from training data, so log those separately |
| Gemini | Ask in a fresh chat and open any linked sources | Links that look right but lead nowhere, given the Tow Center findings |
| Perplexity | Ask once and read the numbered sources | The easiest to log, since every claim is tied to a source |
| Google AI Overviews | Search in a private window on Google | No Overview at all is a result too, so write it down |
| Google AI Mode | Open the AI Mode tab in Google Search | Longer answers pulling from more sources, so citations spread thinner |
How to Read What You Find
Wellows’ analysis of 20.5 million scored AI citations, collected from 8 March to 31 July 2026, found that 301 domains with Domain Authority scores of 90 or higher received 17% of citations. Wellows reviews brand mentions, cited URLs, and descriptions separately. The five patterns below are practical audit checks; they do not establish why an engine selected a source.
| Pattern | What it usually means | What to do next | How to review it in Wellows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named, never cited | The sampled answer names the brand without linking an owned page | Rewrite key pages answer first and earn mentions on the sites it does cite | Compare named brands with cited URLs; inspect owned-page coverage separately. |
| Cited, never named | The sampled answer links your page without naming the brand in the passage | Make your brand and expertise obvious on those pages | Open the cited URL in Wellows and check whether its passage names the brand. |
| Strong on one platform, missing on another | The sampled engines show different coverage; the cause needs investigation | Check robots.txt and CDN settings for that engine’s crawler | Compare the same prompt and market across engines before checking technical access. |
| Described wrongly | The description may contain a factual error, stale information, or an opinion | Trace the claim to its URL and get it corrected at the source | Review the answer and cited passage against current first-party information; separate errors from opinions. |
| Missing everywhere | No appearance was observed in the sample; check the prompts and collection conditions | Narrow the prompts and test crawler access first | Check prompt relevance, collection status, and engine coverage before treating an absence as a brand-wide finding. |
Wellows AI visibility audit checklist
Running the Same Audit in Wellows
The manual audit works. It also eats an afternoon every week, and the spreadsheet gets messy by round three.
Here’s how each step maps to Wellows.
| Audit step | By hand | In Wellows |
|---|---|---|
| Build the prompt set | An afternoon of brainstorming | The free ChatGPT visibility tracker builds 40 intent-based prompts from your own site |
| Run five platforms | Hours per round | Runs daily across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews and AI Mode |
| Named vs cited | Your judgment, answer by answer | Separates explicit citations from implicit ones, where your domain is used but your name isn’t |
| Tone and accuracy | Reading every answer | Sourced Sentiment links each description back to the page that caused it |
| Competitors | Extra columns you’ll stop filling in | Citation Score, Citation Rank and competitor share, side by side |
| More than one market | A separate run per country | Projects split by region |
The column that matters most in your spreadsheet is the one with URLs in it. A mention means you came up. A citation means the AI sent someone to you. Wellows keeps those apart and shows which pages are behind each one, including the ones quietly shaping a negative answer.
Start with the free check; no signup needed. If you want to see the full daily view first, there’s a sample report you can open.
Conclusion
Block two hours this week. Create 25 prompts. Test all five platforms, and keep track of name, citation, positioning, and tone.
And then fix one thing you discover; it is usually an inaccurate description or the fact that you do not exist on one of the platforms.
